Elephants with one tusk are common, but not mutants. Tarangire NP, Aug 2011 |
One of the joys of working in the bush
is that there's always something new to see, and every now and again
we come across something very, very odd. Some times we see the
disfiguring effects of a disease or accident – one tusked elephants
are particularly common. But occasionally we find evidence of a much
more fundamental accident – a genetic mutation. One of the
commonest is albanism, or partial albanism (more properly called
leucisism – technically, you can't have a partial albino). True
albinos are very rare in nature and occur when all the genes that
control colour are, somehow, switched off (even those involved in
eye-colour). I don't know if this baboon is a true albino, as I
couldn't see the eyes, but I wouldn't be too surprised if he was.
(I'll find out one day I'm sure – he lives in Arusha NP and I first
saw him as a tiny baby over a year ago. One day he'll come close
enough to see!) More often you'll see animals that lack colour in
just some parts of their body, or sometimes lack all the pigments of
one type – lacking melanin (which gives the black colours) is
relatively common, and often results in sandy looking creatures, as
the orange and yellow pigments are still present. Still rarer than
colour mutations are the really strange mutants you sometimes see,
like the buffalo below – something completely mad has happened here!
Albino Baboon, Arusha NP, Aug 2011 |
Entertaining as it is to see such
strange creatures, I think there's quite a lot we can learn from
these animals. Look, for example, at this buffalo, and compare it
with the normal animal in the same herd – it's not doing very well!
That's not surprising – with horns like that I find it very hard to
believe it can graze properly – more likely ir can only nibble the
tallest grass everyone else leaves, or is forced to browse, which can
hardly be good for a buffalo. As for the baboon, well, he seems
healthy enough – but I was still rather surprised to see him still
going strong now aged one year – there are so many crowned eagles,
leopards and martial eagles around Arusha National Park, and he
sticks out from the crowd so much I expected him to be the first to
go. He's been lucky so far... Which gives us our first lesson - most
mutations are bad for the health, which explains why we don't see
many more mutants when we're out and about.
Mutant buffalo (probably cow), Tarangire NP, Sep 2011 |
Much more normal buffalo, same herd! |
So what about evolution, I hear you
ask? Evolution is works because mutations are passed on from one
generation to the next, yet lesson one is that mutations are bad for
the health! What's going on there? Now, whilst that is definitely
true for big and obvious mutations (in fact, most of the really big
mutations that occur are probably automatically aborted - miscarried
- in the womb before birth), it doesn't mean there aren't lots of
mutations happening that we don't obviously see. In fact, for every
human it's estimated that there are NNN unique mutations we have that
have occurred in the genes we inherited for our parents: we don't
have perfect copies of our parents DNA at all. Happily, most of the
mutations have no or very little impact – which is why we don't see
them – but the good news is that a few might have small benefits.
And so this is lesson two, that evolution normally happens in very,
very small stages – the accumulation of lots of tiny little
beneficial mutations that we generally never see. That's not to say
that we can't see evolution in action with the mutations we do see –
in fact, the elimination of 'bad' mutations from the population is
just as much a part of the evolutionary process as the incremental
development of new changes. So simply by looking at this skinny
buffalo, we see natural selection working – whilst the animal might
still be alive (and obviously has survived a number of years), I
don't think it's in any condition to pass its genes on to the next
generation. So that could be my third and final lesson that we can
learn from these mutant animals – that natural selection results
not only in the accumulation of beneficial traits, but also in the
elimination of sub-optimal genes too. That might not sound so
important right away, but maybe in time we'll look at why it does
matter, particularly when animal populations are reduced and
individuals start to breed with their own relatives.
And finally, let's just remember that
accidents – like the one-tusked elephant – are completely
different from mutations. The effect of an accident will never be
passed on to future generations because it's got nothing to do with
genes (though the propensity to have accidents, of course, might
do!). Only mutations in the DNA will be passed on to future
generations, if the animal concerned survives to breed.
No comments:
Post a Comment