Pangani Longclaw Macronyx aurantiigula is perhaps the best example of a species extending west, having colonised Serengeti recently. |
A blog about ecology of the savanna biome and other regions of interest to safari guides and visitors to East Africa.
Showing posts with label Birds. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Birds. Show all posts
Tuesday, 9 July 2013
What is the influence of climate change on Tanzanian protected areas?
Wednesday, 1 May 2013
Indian house crows and invasive aliens
![]() |
Indian House Crow, not the prettiest... Thanks to Dick Daniels |
First though, identification is fairly simple: the house crow is a medium-large all black and grey bird, usually found in flocks in towns all along the coast and, in some areas, invading inland too. It is very loud, with a persistent "Carr, Carr, Carr" call that is the constant sound of Dar es Salaam bird life... There are few confusion species in East Africa, the only other common species of crow being the black and white Pied Crow, which often hangs about with the house crow.
Wednesday, 10 April 2013
Common birds: Rattling cisticola and why birds hold territories?
![]() |
Rattling Cisticola, near Arusha, March 2011. Something of a birder's bird? |
First the identification. Let's be honest, Cisticolas can be something of a challenge to identify! It doesn't help that there are seven pages of nearly identical looking small, streaky brown birds in the fieldguide! Happily, there are better ways to identify Cisticolas than their looks - the key is always to listen. Most Cisticolas, and rattling is no exception, have fairly distinctive calls and once you know it their 'tee, tee, churrurrurr' call is a constant sound in the bush (click the link to find a recording on xeno-canto), especially during the rains when they breed. In the unlucky event that none are making any noises, you can usually be fairly confident in your identification of any moderately sized, streaky cisticola present in the drier bush regions as rattling simply because they're so common! They are surprisingly variable in size (sometimes appearing really rather small) and colour (from very grey to warmer brown - but never with bright chestnut on the wing or head) though, so don't be too taken in my any one feature if they're not calling.
Thursday, 14 March 2013
Common birds: Red-billed Quelea, commonest bird in the world?
![]() |
1000s of quelea at a dam on Manyara Ranch |
So, first the identification. The most obvious thing about red-billed queleas are, as the name suggests, a large red beak! Apart from that feature, females and non-breeding males are rather nondescript, small sparrow-like birds. Breeding males are rather brighter, with the red bill surrounded by a black face and variable amounts of orange on the top of the head and breast, with otherwise sparrow-like brown streaks on the back and wings. Perhaps the most useful identification feature though is the fact that you almost never see just one, but flocks of tens, hundreds or thousands of busy quelea all searching for grass seeds or drinking at waterholes.
Thursday, 31 January 2013
Common Birds: the case of the Baglafecht Weaver and missing forests
![]() |
Male Baglafecht Weaver, Mt Kilimanjaro |
If you live on or near an East African mountain, you're very likely to have Baglafecht Weavers in your garden. Like most of the other true weavers, they're a basic black and yellow colour. The first thing to look at in weavers is usually the colour of the eyes and legs: in Baglafecht weavers you'll always see a yellow eye (easy to see against the surrounding black feathers) and pink legs. Males and females differ slightly: males in the population in northern Tanzania and Kenya have only a black mask on the face, with yellow on the top of the head right down to the (black) beak. Females have an all dark head. In northern Tanzania the back of both sexes is essentially black, with some yellow wing edges, in other areas of Tanzania the back is greenish/grey and not as strongly contrasting. Juveniles of all forms are rather greener and lacking in black, but still have the yellow eye. Like other weavers, they weave their nests from grasses in colonies of 5-15 pairs (not usually in very large groups) and males in the breeding season are pretty noisy with their rather scratchy and squeeky song!
![]() |
Baglafecht weaver nests aren't the neatest of affairs... |
Wednesday, 23 January 2013
Common birds: Ring-necked Dove
![]() |
Ring-necked Dove (Cape Turtle Dove) in Tarangire, photo from here |
The sound of the Ring-necked Dove is one of the constant backgrounds to a safari in the bush (if you don't know it, the "work harder, drink lager" refrain is available here) and it's actually this distinctive song that is the easiest way to identify the species from among a number of confusingly similar species. The ring-necked dove is a medium sized, grey dove. It has a black collar around the back of its neck and is a paler grey white below, with pale edges to its tail. Unfortunately, that description is would cover just about any of the close relatives of this species, and (as well as listening to the calls) you need to look rather closer to identify the species correctly. Firstly, look at the eye: if it is dark and not obviously surrounded by bare skin, you're probably looking at a Ring-necked Dove. White (not grey) edges to the tail and a generally pale grey would confirm the identity in eastern and southern Africa. If the eye is pale yellowish, with a red ring around it and there's a warmer brownish wash to the back and neck that contrasts with a grey head, you're probably looking at an African Mourning Dove (call) and if its got a dark eye in a bare purple/red patch of skin, and is overall darker looking, with grey tail edges, you're looking at a Red-eyed Dove (call: "I am a Red-eyed Dove").
Sunday, 6 January 2013
Common Bulbul and frugivorous birds
![]() |
Common Bulbul nesting in Arusha |
Friday, 7 December 2012
Common birds (1)
![]() |
Speckled Mousebird, Arusha. Cute, and really quite interesting... |
So, let's start today, in no particular order, with the Speckled Mousebird.
Tuesday, 3 April 2012
African Vulture Declines
![]() |
I saw this hooded vulture in Tarangire this weekend, so they are still around! |
Monday, 19 March 2012
Distribution of Ethiopian Bush-crow and the nature of explanations
Yesterday I was sent a link to a press release from the excellent BirdLife International (read it here). It's talking about some research by an international team to try and explain the remarkably restricted range of the Ethiopian Bush-crow (cute picture here, since I've never actually been there to take my own), and in it, Paul Donald the lead author makes some interesting comments:
“The mystery surrounding this bird and its odd behaviour has stumped scientists for decades – many have looked and failed to find an answer. But the reason they failed, we now believe, is that they were looking for a barrier invisible to the human eye, like a glass wall. Inside the ‘climate bubble’, where the average temperature is less than 20°C, the bush-crow is almost everywhere. Outside, where the average temperature hits 20°C or more, there are no bush-crows at all. A cool bird, that appears to like staying that way.”
The reason this species is so completely trapped inside its little bubble is as yet unknown, but it seems likely that it is physically limited by temperature – either the adults, or more likely its chicks, simply cannot survive outside the bubble, even though there are thousands of square miles of identical habitat all around.
BirdLife International’s Dr Nigel Collar is co-author of the study. He added “Whatever the reason this bird is confined to a bubble, alarm bells are now ringing loudly. The storm of climate change threatens to swamp the bush-crow’s little climatic lifeboat – and once it’s gone, it’s gone for good.”
Monday, 12 March 2012
Why do birds sing in the morning?
![]() |
Ruppell's Robin-chat: an impressive mimic. Lake Duluti |
Sunday, 4 March 2012
Migrant bird population declines, an African perspective
![]() |
Willow warbler singing in Africa - 10g but probably headed to eastern Siberia... |
![]() |
Barred warblers are always a treat to see: headed to eastern Europe. |
Tuesday, 21 February 2012
Why the hornbill shuts its nest
![]() |
Von der Decken Hornbill nest cavity - it's tiny! |
Wednesday, 15 February 2012
The wheatear's remarkable migration: Alaska to East Africa
A great piece of research came my way today, detailing the migration of the individual wheatears from their Alaskan breeding areas to winter territories in East Africa. We've long known this must happen, as pretty much all the world's Northern Wheatears Oenanthe oenanthe spend the winter in Africa, but now technology has allowed us to follow individual birds on their 14,600km long migration from Alaska to East Africa and back. It's a remarkable story, not least that a 20g songbird can repeatedly do this sort of movement, but that we now have devices that can be attached to such small birds and record their journey. Wheatears are also a favourite of mine, and their migration has been the subject of one of my student's research so I almost feel qualified to make a few comments!
![]() |
Migration routes and wintering grounds of three northern wheatears breeding in Alaskan (AK) and one in the eastern Canadian Arctic (CN; grey dot, breeding area, blue, autumn migration, orange, spring migration, dashed lines indicate uncertainty in migration routes close to equinoxes). Fifty per cent kernel densities of winter fixes (beginning of December 2009-end of February; purple, bird AK-1; green, bird AK-2; orange, bird AK-3; blue, bird CN-1) are given depending on the sun elevation selected (with 228 for most southern and with 24.58 for most northern densities). Pie charts indicate the proportion of individuals (AK: n 1/4 9, CN: n 1/4 4) originating from one of the three pre-defined wintering regions (red, western; orange, central; yellow, eastern) [8] based on stable-hydrogen isotope (dD) values in winter grown feathers and the dD values within each wintering region (mean+s.d. shown); Credit: F. Bairlein et al. 'Global migration of wheatears' (doi:10.1098/rsbl.2011.1223) in Biology Letters |
Sunday, 29 January 2012
Why are female raptors usually bigger than males?

Sunday, 15 January 2012
Life spans of tropical birds
![]() |
Admirng a White-browed Scrub Robin! |
![]() |
Pangani Longclaws are very impressive up close |
![]() |
Lovebirds can live up to 20 years - they can also bite hard, so be careful extracting! |
Sunday, 8 January 2012
How colourful are birds?
![]() |
Lilac-breasted Roller, eveyone's safari favourite! Indigo & Violet |
![]() |
Red: Scarlet-chested Sunbirds use structural and pigmented colours |
To understand how anyone can ever assess exactly how many colours are availalbe to birds, you need to start by understanding that many birds (though not all) actually see more colours than us - a lot can see ultraviolet light, as well as the usual combination or red, green and blue that we humans (and most other primates) see. (By contrast, most other mammals lack even our ability to see red, so they must live in a rather dull-looking world!) So by knowing the entire set of colours that can be generated from red, blue, green and ultraviolet the authors identified the potential range of colours available to birds, and they then sat down and looked at nearly 1000 (965 to be precise) sets of feathers and precicesly measured their colour, then plotted it in the red/green/blue/uv colour space. And they discovered that despite their efforts to find feathers covering as many different colour types as they could, they only found colours in about 1/3rd of the available space. In particular, birds seem to be missing a lot of the different options of green and purple. Now, there certainly are green and purple birds out there, but not all the possible forms of green, and not all the possible sorts of purple. (They're not particularly good at pure UV either - but that might in part reflect the author's inability to identify strongly UV feather groups in their initial search - we can't see it after all!)
Wednesday, 28 December 2011
More amazing honeyguide discoveries!
![]() |
Steel-blue Whydah, Seronera, Dec 2011. |
![]() |
Greater Honeyguide, Tarangire, Sep 2011 |
![]() |
Male Greater Honeyguide, Tarangire, Sep 2011 |
They show very nicely that Greater Honeyguides have two main groups of host species - birds that nest in tree holes (African Hoopoe, Green Wood-hoopoe, etc.), and those that nest in earth holes (Little Bee-eater, Striped Kingfisher, etc.). The former have larger and longer eggs, the latter smaller, rounder ones. And so two forms of female greater honeyguides seem to have evolved - one specialising in the tree nesters, one in the ground nesters and as expected the females of each group lay appropriately shaped and sized eggs. So how do they do it? Well, one of the important theories that was developed as long ago as 1933 is based on another fundamental difference between birds and mammals that's important to know. In both mammals and birds the sex of a developing embryo is determined by chromosomes, the DNA containing structures that control inheritance. In mammals, everyone has one 'X' chromosome we inherit from our mothers, but from our fathers we can either inherit another 'X' chromosome (which would make us female), or - like our father - we could inherit a 'Y' chromosome, which would make us male. The 'Y' chromosome is therefore inhereted father to son, to grandson, etc., without ever finding itself in a female, and it's this pattern of inheritance that makes us male or female. Now what differs in birds is that instead of the X and Y combination making us male, it would make a bird female. Male birds have two of the same type of chromosomes, females are the ones with the different pair, and to make this distinction easier we don't use the X and Y terminology, but talk of W and Z chromosomes instead. So, unlike in mammals, it's the females of birds who have a unique chromosome that is passed one through mother to daughter to grand-daughter, without ever passing through a male. So if the information for how to colour your egg is stored on this chromosome, no information about it will ever come from a male. A neat solution to how the species as a whole can be unified by the males, but females can differ (possibly substantially) in the genes they have on their unique chromosome.Hope that's clear...
Now, Claire and her group went one step further and decided to look for differences in a special sort of DNA called mitochondrial DNA that is also only inherited from mother to daughter, and compare the degree of difference between the two groups of tree and ground parasitising females in the mitochondrial DNA with the difference in the DNA in the main part of the cell that comes from both male and females. They expected - and rather neatly demonstrated - that there might be substantial differentiation between the females in mitochondrial DNA, but that the males would mean there's little difference in the main 'nuclear' DNA. And the degree of difference in the mitochondrial DNA between the tree and ground nesters was so much that their ancestors started breeding in these two different way millions of years ago! That's pretty remarkable, and rather different from the more recent splits reported for cuckoos, probably brought on by relatively recent host changes. Why this difference? Well, they speculate that it's thanks to the greater staility of the African climate compared to the Northern one where most of the work on other brood parasites has been undertaken, but I'm not yet convinced - if we could compare similar patterns for a few local cuckoos too, that might be very interesting!
Anyway, all very impressive and a great lesson not only in the complexities of brood parasitism that is fascinating to me, but a bit on sex determination too - a subject we're sure to return to in the future...
Reference:
Spottiswoode, C., Stryjewski, K., Quader, S., Colebrook-Robjent, J., & Sorenson, M. (2011). Ancient host specificity within a single species of brood parasitic bird Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 108 (43), 17738-17742 DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1109630108
Sunday, 13 November 2011
Woodpeckers as keystone species
It's been a while since I posted a
birdy blog and since I got some nice pictures of a Cardinal
Woodpecker at the weekend, I thought I'd use it as an opportunity to
talk about woodpeckers in general, since they're surprisingly
important in the habitats they occupy. As usual, we'll look to answer
the three questions I use to prompt me when seeing wildlife – what
is it? What's it doing? And what's it's role in the ecosystem.
![]() |
Female Nubian Woodpecker, Kisima Ngeda, Aug 2011 |
So, for identification, woodpeckers are
generally fairly easy. In most of northern Tanzania and Kenya, there
are four common species of savannah woodpeckers – the commonly seen
Nubian, spotted all over; Bearded, the largest and with a black
throat and stripy face; the rather small and neat Cardinal, with
spots on the back and streaks on the front, and the very colourful
Grey. Away from the dry north of Tanzania the Nubian is replaced by a
number of other options – Bennett's or Speckle-throated being the
obvious ones. There are plenty of other species around, of course,
but they're mainly associated with forest and we'll forget about them
for now. Woodpeckers in general are rather widespread, obviously
similar species occur on every continent except, rather strangely,
Australia. They're relatively closely related to barbets and
hornbills (note the zygodactyly – two toes forwards, two-toes
backwards – they share with the barbets, easily seen in some of
these photos). So, that's what they are. Now what do they do?
![]() |
Male Cardinal Woodpecker, Manyara Ranch, Nov 2011 |
Normally you'll come across a
woodpecker first when you hear it, either calling – Nubians in
particular are noisy – or from hearing the 'tap-tap-tap' of their
beak on a tree. Calling is often done by pairs, and we can safely
assume it serves the dual purpose of strengthening a pair bond and
communicating to neighbours that the territory is occupied. The
tapping is where it gets more interesting – most of this is
exploratory, trying to find hollow bits under the bark where tasty
larvae may live, some is more obviously getting at the food once
they've found it, and some it again a territorial statement like
calling – though this purpose seems to be less common here in
Africa than in northern regions. And the most interesting of all is
the hard banging they use to excavate nest holes. I'm sure (unless
you're Australian!) we've all seen the beautifully neat holes
woodpeckers make for their nests, often several holes in a single
stem. There's two things that are particularly interesting about this
to me – the first is how they do it in the first place. The speed
and pressure generated in order to dig into the wood is extraordinary
– the deceleration from 6-7m/sec to stationary at impact isequivalent to 1000 times the pull of gravity – the effect on humans
would be similar to Usain Bolt running head-first into a brick wall
at the end of his 100m sprint. Not pretty, I should think! And the
adaptations they have to avoid the problems we'd get from banging out
head on a brick wall are also impressive – slightly differentlength upper and lower mandibles, extra thick skull, fluid-filledshock absorbers, unusual size and shape of brain, etc., etc. Quite
remarkable really!
![]() |
Grey Woodpecker, Near Arusha, March 2011 |
But the second thing about these holes
is where they get really interesting. Woodpeckers mostly use theholes they excavate only once, after which the holes are available to
anything else that likes to live in holes – birds, bats, other
mammals and all. In fact, there's a huge array of animals that live
in holes, but can't make them themselves (though some, like barbets,
may make adjustments to get the hole right for them). Over time the
holes get larger and larger, allowing a whole host of species to find
homes. In some northern forests, woodpeckers have disappeared (for anumber of reasons we don't need to go into), and once the holes aregone, so too do all the other species that make use of them. Thus the
loss of woodpeckers has much greater impacts on the whole ecology of
a woodland than the simple direct effect – the consequences cascade
down through other species too. Which is exactly why some people suggest woodpeckers may be seen as keystone species – a single
species that holds together a whole load of other species and have
disproportionate impacts on the ecosystem. Mighty important things,
woodpeckers!
![]() |
This Brown-breasted Barbet is probably uing an old woodpecker hole, Nr Boma Ng'ombe, March 2011 |
Monday, 10 October 2011
Waifs and strays
![]() |
Eurasian Bee-eaters at Manyara Ranch, Jan 2011 |
![]() |
Chestnut weaver in non-breeding plumage, Manyara Ranch Aug 2011 |
And this weekend I enjoyed a walk (in the rain - I am British, after all) around Lake Duluti where, among the regular species, a lesser flamingo was swimming around the lake in the company of this rather fine black duck. African black ducks are usually found rather rarely on highland rivers and streams, so this was quite a surprise - note it's very long body and obvious white wing marks, plus white bits on the base of the bill that separate it from other species here abouts. This and the flamingo were both new birds for me to see at Duluti, despite many visits there. The diversity of birds in Africa is truly amazing, and now, with the start of the rains, is a great time to look out for unusual things moving between their more regular locations. The forecast is for a good short rains around this part of Tanzania this year, so expect lots of breeding activing in the next few weeks too - all very exciting! Let me know if you see anything good!
![]() |
African Black Duck, Lake Duluti, Oct 2011 |
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)